Skip to main content

The Brave Little Parrot


Source: Buddhist Legend
(Rafe Martin's Adoption)

LITERAL COMPREHENSION:

"The Brave Little Parrot" is taken out from Buddhist legend. This short story deals about the importance of continuous helpful effort done by a little parrot to other creatures in the jungle.

Long ago, the Buddha was born as a little parrot and went to live in the jungle. One day, there was lightning, and the thunder struck the jungle, and the fire took the jungle in its grip. All the birds flew away to save their lives. Many animals got trapped on the flames and smoke. While the parrot was flying to the rivers, he saw on the way that many animals were trapped in the fire. The little parrot saw the plight of the animals. He was kind and brave. Not being able to tolerate the sufferings of animals, the little parrot made a plan to save their lives. The parrot flew towards the river, dived into the water, flew back and dropped the water of his body over the fire. But the water disappeared before reaching the fire. He continued his effort. Though it was too tired, the little parrot repeatedly went to the river & came back with drops of water with the hope of extinguishing fire.  His wings and legs burn, his eyes became red like burning coals, his lungs ached and he felt giddiness (dizziness). Meanwhile some gods were watching all this from heaven. They thought that parrot was foolish and laughed at his fruitless effort but one of the gods was worried about parrot. So he disguised as golden eagle and came to the parrot. He advised the little parrot to give up his effort and save himself. But the little parrot replied that he needed help than any advice. The answer of the parrot melted the heart of the golden eagle; he felt ashamed & began to weep. The tears of the eagle came down on the earth as a cool rain and put out the fire. Miraculously the tears gave new life to everything including parrot.  The fire was extinguished. New life sprung where the tears fell on. All the dead animals & the plants got their life back as if nothing had happened in the jungle. Multicolored feathers grew on the parrot’s body and he looked very handsome. The revived animals thanked the little parrot very much.

INTERPRETATION:

The writer may be trying to show the importance of selfless service. This beautiful story is probably trying to give the message that we can get success at the end if we continue our efforts without any hesitation. Because of its strong determination, the little parrot got victory over the deadly fire. Similarly, it also tells us that even the God has to bend its head in front of little creature like parrot if it takes the path of selfless welfare.

CRITICAL THINKING:

Though this story teaches very good moral lesson, some ideas of the writer are not convincing. The story is successful in spreading the Buddhist philosophy of social welfare. But a lot of questions emerge in the mind of a critical reader. Do Gods exist? If so, what is the proof of them? Can the Buddha really disguise as a parrot? Can the birds like the parrot have the feeling of help? Can the drops of tears put out such big forest’s fire? Can once dead animals and plants revive? So these are some of the situations in the story that are not agreeable.

ASSIMILATION:

The story is based on a myth. The story beautifully draws the Buddhist philosophy of ‘live and let live.’ After reading the story, I truly understood the value of living in a society. We are growing selfish these days. The story teaches us the principle of community service. Before reading this story I used to laugh at others troubles and I didn't use to help needed people and animals. But this story brought great change in my thought and behavior. I also learn that we should devote ourselves in the selfless social service to become great person.  The story motivates its readers to be laborious, and help the others in need. Value of brotherhood is glorified in the story.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BBS First Year English Question Paper with Possible Answers (TU 2021)

PROFESSIONS FOR WOMEN - Virginia Woolf (1882-1941)

Summary : Virginia Adeline Woolf (1882-1941) was an English novelist and essayist, regarded as one of the foremost modernist literary figures of the twentieth century. She was one of the leaders in the literary movement of modernism.  The speech of  Professions for Women  was given in 1931 to the Women’s Service League by Virginia Woolf. It was also included in  Death of a Moth  and  Other Essays  in 1942. Throughout the speech, Virginia Woolf brings forward a problem that is still relevant today:  gender inequality .   Woolf’s main point in this essay was to bring awareness to the phantoms (illusions) and obstacles women face in their jobs. Woolf argues that women must overcome special obstacles to become successful in their careers. She describes two hazards she thinks all women who aspire to professional life must overcome: their tendency to sacrifice their own interests to those of others and their reluctance (hesitancy) to challenge conservative male attitudes .  She starts her

Summary and Analysis of My Mother Never Worked

MY MOTHER NEVER WORKED Bonnie Smith - Yackel SYNOPSIS   In the essay “ My Mother Never Worked ,” Bonnie Smith-Yackel recollects the time when she called Social Security to claim her mother’s death benefits. Social Security places Smith-Yackel on hold so they can check their records on her mother, Martha Jerabek Smith . While waiting, she remembers the many things her mother did, and the compassion her mother felt towards her husband and children. When Social Security returns to the phone, they tell Smith-Yackel that she could not receive her mother’s death benefits because her mother never had a wage-earning job. A tremendous amount of irony is used in this essay. The title, in itself, is full of irony; it makes readers curious about the essay’s point and how the author feels about the situation. Smith-Yackel uses the essay to convey her opinion of work. Her thesis is not directly stated; however, she uses detail upon detail to prove her mother did work, just not in the eyes of the